How to write a review of a scientific article

In practice, authors often have any questions that it should approximately contain an article review, consider examples of such reviews, and also find out how to write a review of the article. The question arises, why do you need a review on a scientific article and is it mandatory? The need to review the scientific article is a requirement established by the highest attestation commission (hereinafter - VAK) to publish an article in the journal included in the list of WAK.

What should contain a review

The thesis analysis of the article is given, the quality of the content, compliance with the requirements for registration, is given, the degree of innovation of the research is reflected, the relevance of the study of the advanced branches of science, the significance of this article in practical activity.

In conclusion, the signature of the reviewer and the corresponding seal is set.

Email Copy Review is not an original document. Some editors require the provision of the original.

Therefore, it is necessary to send the original review of the review in advance (in person or by mail) in advance.

As a general rule, the review is written by the volume of about 4 thousand characters (with spaces).

In order for the review to be a stylistically competent document, we recommend using the following turns:

the significance of this research is indisputable ...
after analyzing the peer-reviewed work ...
the author in the article covers the problem in detail ...
the author expressed a fairly bold point of view ...
this article is a sample of non-standard methods ...
work is performed at a high level ...
the article is an example of a deep study of the problem ...
the title of the article Emko reflects its essence itself ...
the author writes about the problem ...
the need to write an article on the indicated issues is caused by the current state ...
it should be noted exactly placed in the article accents ...
the author studied a large amount of actual material ...
from the reviewed work should be ....
the essence of this article is that ...
author made very logical conclusions based on the data obtained ...
the conclusions of the work are consistently proven ....

Sample review plan

When writing a review should be guided by a certain structure. The reviewer must write feedback, guided by the following criteria:

Table of contents of the article, position and surname, name, patronymic of the author of the article;
Thesis coverage of the question to which the article is devoted;
The urgency of the chosen topic;
Assessment of the importance of the results of the scientific research of the author;
Is the article recommended for publication;
Be sure to write the scientist or a scientist degree, position, place of work, the name of the reviewer.

Review of the supervisor on an article for publishing in the journal VAC

Often the question arises, how to write a scientific review of the WAK article. Such a review is usually written according to the general rules for the preparation of reviews, signed by the scientific director with the seal of the institution, where the supervisor works.

Reviewers can be like internal, so I. external. The first type of reviews are usually signed by the supervisor. The review of the university is put on the review, where the author works or works. The second type of review is signed by officials of third-party institutions - editions, specialists from other universities.

An objective assessment of the article is necessary, the strengths of the work are stated, as well as its shortcomings.

The advantages of the article, as a rule, is a logical and consistent presentation of the essence of the study, innovation in solving the problem, the ability to convey in a clear form of the essence of scientific results. Reviewers also note the ability to correctly express their point of view in an article with a form of controversy with scientific opponents.

Fragment of the review on the scientific article of VAK "Aspects of the economic sustainability of the state". (Example)

Sample Review of Scientific Article

Consider a sample review of a scientific article for publishing in the journal.

It must be remembered that the positive, competently composed review is a key to a positive decision on the publication of a scientific article, which will further allow to apply for the successful protection of the scientific project as a whole.