How the exam appeal is checked. What to do if you do not agree with the USE scores - rules for filing an appeal

Unified state exam State exam- since 2009 it is a compulsory form of attestation of students and gives the right to admission to higher education educational institution... It is taken in the form of testing in the main educational areas. In the event of any disputable situations regarding the examination, or the results of the assessment of the graduate, an appeal hearing is carried out by a special conflict commission.

As of today, it remains to conduct the assessment on the following previously scheduled dates:

An additional period for passing the exam in September 2018 is also assigned:

During this period, those who did not pass the exam in the main round can take exams; EGE participants who want to increase the passing score; graduates of previous years or whose certificate has expired (i.e. after 4 years from the date of receipt)

Appeal of the exam 2018 how to file: deadline for filing a complaint with the conflict commission

If during passing the exam a controversial situation has arisen, and the graduate is not satisfied with the assessment, it is possible to solve this problem with the participation of a special conflict commission.

There are certain deadlines for filing an application by a GIA participant. On the day of the exam, immediately after passing the exam form, you can file a complaint about the violation of the GIA in the academic subject

Within two working days after receiving USE results, you can challenge the score obtained as a result of the assessment.

The Commission does not deal with issues related to the content of examination tasks. Does not consider complaints in the event of a short answer from the graduate, if the graduate violates the current procedure, or if the paperwork does not meet the requirements of the USE. Students' drafts are not counted as arguments for appeal.

Appeal of the Unified State Exam 2018 how to file: appeals on the violation of the Unified State Exam

In case of filing an appeal related to a violation of the exam, you need to go to the organizer at the end of the exam and take the application forms. This is done before leaving the PPE building. The appeal is made in two copies. Both copies are signed by a representative of the SEC. Then one copy remains with the student, the second is transferred to the conflict commission. The student is provided with information about the date and place of the hearing.

On the same day, the members of the GEC in the PPE organize a commission that examines the data in the appeal and establishes their reliability. The results are recorded in the appropriate conclusion. Then it is transferred to the conflict commission together with the appeal.

An appeal for a violation of the established procedure for the EGA is considered within 2 working days. If the appeal is upheld, the student is given the right to take the exam again.

Appeal of the USE 2018 how to file: appeals on disagreement with the set score

An appeal on disagreement with the points awarded is filed within 2 working days from the date of notification of the results obtained.

For this procedure, you need to go to educational institution or the commission of the PPE, receive there, from the secretary, the appeal forms in 2 copies, fill out and sign them by authorized persons. One copy remains with the graduate, the second is transferred to the conflict commission. Next, the student will be provided with information about the place and time of the proceedings.

On the appointed day, the USE participant who filed an appeal comes to the indicated place and presents to the commission a passport and a document certifying the passing of the exam. If the appellant is a minor, he or she may be accompanied by parents or guardians, also with identity documents. An appeal may be considered without the presence of the complainant. This process is carried out within 4 working days.

During the trial, the examiner, together with a member of the commission, examines the work for errors, thus identifying why the computer saw no match. The program may crash if the answer is not clearly formulated. In case of revealing the correctness of the appellant, it is satisfied and the points are recalculated. Otherwise, the appeal is dismissed.

A few years ago, it was better not to meddle with the appeal on the USE estimates. It was more than problematic to see your own works plainly; accompanying persons, even if they were the parents of the appellant, were mercilessly cut off from their presence on the commission.

And in order to finally discourage children from complaining about injustice, the appeal commissions were allowed not only to refuse to raise points, but these points downgrade... And in a number of cases they did just that, after which the movement of the appellants did not quite “get stumped,” according to Radishchev, but for several years it quieted down noticeably.

The new appeal rules are more comfortable for children. Now in Moscow you can see your work in personal account, analyze it, consult with the teacher and parents and only then decide whether to go to the appeal. In addition, public observers have been present at the appeal for the second year now. But...

It is not difficult to write an appeal for violations of the procedure: the main thing is to remember that this can be done only immediately, without leaving the exam. It should be noted that this is exactly what the guys who did not have enough additional forms on the Unified State Exam in literature did this during the current campaign. And their appeals were upheld.

But with an attempt to raise grades, the situation is more complicated. Especially in humanitarian subjects with their inevitable interpretive bias: “In the exact sciences,” the teachers of mathematics and physics assured “MK”, there are no problems with evaluating works, including with appeals, since a number is a number, and a formula there is a formula - either they are correct or not. "

The bulk of this year's appeals are yet to come. However, a couple of typical situations can be seen on the example of last year.

This is a very nervous and unpleasant procedure: the children do not understand why their score was lowered, and sob, and the members of the commission sit with stone faces, do not listen to explanations and insist on their own, - Olga, the mother of last year's graduate, told MK. they are sure that they have an unspoken order not to raise their ratings: they say that in this case they will be deprived of their bonuses.

And this is very similar to the truth: my daughter, for example, was reduced the point for using not two quotes, but five in the mini-essay in the Unified State Exam in Russian. And at the appeal they said: "You will download the rights, we will count one more quote and generally lower the score." And in general they behaved very tough. The child sobbed and we left.

I filed an appeal in the Russian language, - says a graduate of last year, an excellent student Liza. - I wrote samples for 100 points, and got only 82.

In particular, it seemed to me unfair to lower the score for the speech turn "to listen to persuasion" (it was about the dialogue between Lopakhin and Ranevskaya in "The Cherry Orchard" - "MK"). But they didn’t add a single point to me: the members of the appeal commission stated that “they had not heard such a speech turnover,” although I consulted with the teachers, and they confirmed that it was quite possible. At the same time, not a single public observer on appeal was not - only two members of the commission ...

Nikita's problem at last year's USE in the Russian language turned out to be typical. He, like many other graduates, had his grades lowered for the wrong, according to the version of the assessors, the definition of the problem and the topic of the texts they received.

So, in the case of Nikita, it was believed that the correct answer was “the ecology of speech,” and not just “ecology,” as he wrote. True, the members of his appeal committee were polite and benevolent. And they even recognized the reason for Nikita's mother's reference to the phrase from the keys to the assignment, which allows interpreting the ecology in question in the literal sense of the word. But the appeal was still rejected, advising to file a complaint with Rosobrnadzor. Mom did just that. And there the score, albeit partially, was raised.

However, this happened only at the end of July, when Nikita, with his initial points, was already forced to enter Moscow State University for paid education ...

This year there were no scandals related to the leakage of KIMs before the exam, there are relatively few cases of cheating, but the number of complaints about the procedure and the essence of the appeal about disagreement with exam scores has significantly increased. The Pedagogical Council has collected some of the most revealing stories about how the appeals took place.

Why is the USE appeal in the Russian language a scam?

1. The deadline for filing an appeal is two days. If you are working, then you will not have time to prepare for it.
2. You are not shown KIMs (assignments), including the text on which the essay is being written.
3. It is not allowed to check the test and the correctness of the assignments (meanwhile, the FIPI database contains errors and incorrectly compiled assignments).
4. You are not allowed to familiarize yourself with the full package of documents for the exam. They slip separate pieces of paper for the child to sign and do not give time to familiarize themselves with them.
The documents are not bound. Aunties are running around with a pile of papers. You can lose or replace any of them after the fact.
5. There are no expert edits in the essay, so it is difficult to dispute them. The crazy experts of the conflict commission sometimes are not even able to read the text carefully, so they prefer to intimidate the child and the parents, or blatantly lie and talk nonsense, pointing out "mistakes" where there are none.
6. You are not allowed to file a written statement or a reasoned appeal. They are afraid of this like fire ..
7. Limit the time to 15-20 minutes.
8. You do not know the full name of the experts. They are anonymous.
10. A bustle and confusion is specially created, in one day hundreds of people are passed through the CC. There is no required number of premises. Several CCs sit in the same class.
11. They constantly shout at you, threatening to remove the points already set.
12. It is impossible to reach the Rosobrnadzor hotline by phone.

The appellant cannot influence anything

This year my husband and I took the exam in history as graduates of the past.

The husband's scores were given very low, completely unreasonable. He went to appeal, preparing to defend his position for the whole evening. But it turned out that the appellant could not influence anything: the commission rechecked the work in advance and entered the results into the minutes. The appellant comes simply to personally ask the commission about his result. As a result, he was given 3 points - they were taken off completely incompetently at the first check. But the fourth contested point was not given to him and they could not explain why. Allegedly, there was a factual error in the essay. No matter how much the husband asked to point out this mistake to him, the commission could not do this. They pulled some formulation by the ears, just to answer something. Suspecting a violation of the rules, after the appeal, the husband called the federal hotline of Rosobrnadzor, and there they confirmed that the appellant could not influence the rechecking in any way, no one needed his proof. So the presence of a parent, teacher or tutor is only needed for psychological support... And the presence of the student himself is not clear why.

The points were not returned to us, although the evidence was reinforced concrete

Our conversation went something like this:
- The topic in task 15 is covered well, but we will not return the point, because it was possible to start with the biographical data of the poet.
- No, it was impossible. Substitute lyrical hero biographical author - one of the gross mistakes in the exam in literature.
- Hmm ... But then look, she wrote that the poet must remain real. You should have said "true", this is a factual mistake.
- There is no mistake, these are synonymous words.
- Uh ... Look how bad the handwriting is. Surely it will be possible to find some speech errors.
- There are no speech errors.
- If you wish, you can still find something.

When you come, everything is already decided

This year I passed the exam in my subjects, out of interest. I went to the appeal, as a fool had been preparing her defense strategy all evening, and I was just as simply introduced to the results of the revision of my work. The Rosobrnadzor hotline said that this is the order and everything went smoothly. So, alas, yes - it makes no sense to prepare for an appeal. When you arrive, everything has already been decided, the protocols have been signed.

Wrong because wrong

Today I attended an appeal on the Unified State Exam in Social Studies. There, administrative law does not work, there, as we were told, " educational law". They would be for advanced training ... So, the news:
1. Informational and postindustrial society are one and the same.
2. In the United States - not a democracy.
3. There are two post-industrial countries in the world - Japan and the USA.
4. Economic growth cannot be defined as a stage in the economic cycle.

The procedure is not transparent, the conflict of interests has not been eliminated, the regulations establish only the general procedure, all "particulars" are at the discretion of the Chairman. Arguments on questions are prohibited. The outcome of the appeal is already known (!) At the time of entering the office and it is actually read out. Imagine, really ... You come, they just tell you the result ... and that's it ... And it doesn't matter that none of them understands what a GDP is! And yes, by the way, on a note, GDP is the volume of production. Change your SNS and textbooks urgently. And call Rosstat, otherwise they don't know.

In the morning there was Professor Polyakova, and by lunchtime she began to "listen to mommy." This is a complete profanation. And after that the question is: who teaches our children and what. After all, I would venture to suggest that not the worst teachers sit on the commission. Because of the need to comply with the Law on Personal Data, I do not post the names of the heroes.

How Krasnodar violated the USE appeal

This year I finished 11th grade and passed the exam. I was not pleased with the literary result - only 69 points. What to do in this case? You can either put up with it and go to college for commerce, or appeal for disagreement with the results, which I did. I will say right away that everyone intimidated us by the fact that they would take points for work, that it would be better not to submit anything anywhere. Points were not removed to me, but they were not added either. But the procedure itself was treated like a pig.

1. I went to the head teacher of my school and filled out an appeal form. It was important to choose whether I would be present at the examination of my work / the work would be considered without me / my legal representative would be present instead of me. I chose the first one, i.e. my work had to be rechecked TOGETHER with me. Then I took the form for signature to the director and began to wait for the date when I would need to take the form to the education center.

a) It is written on the Internet that the form should have been in duplicate. I was given one and there were no problems with that.

2. I arrived for identification. I looked through the sheets, signed the paper for the correct scanned first part and the integrity of my work. Here was the first bell. I asked the woman what time I needed to arrive for the appeal. At first she hesitated: "The results will be reported to you by phone." But when I insisted, it turned out that at 14:00 the meeting would take place in the assembly hall, where I was also invited. On this we said goodbye.

3. I came to the meeting. The hall was full of graduates with their parents. Experts were sitting on either side, and on the stage - 10 people were sitting at a huge table, "Big U" (managers).

So, the fun began here. I thought that I would defend my case, they would raise my points and I would easily enter my faculty. But no. The main woman (alas, I do not remember her name) said to all of us sitting in the hall: "Your work has already been checked. Now we will announce your results. If you have any questions, you can ask them to the experts, but your scores will not change." ...

I will not tell you how we had a nice conversation with a woman-expert about romanticism in V. Soloukhin's poem or about how happy 3 girls were, who out of 20-30 who were present were raised the score. I will tell you why I am writing about this here and ask for your help. Now there is such a thing as the "Internet" (yes, yes), and so I talked to people who were on appeal in other cities. They called the CIRCUS what was happening in our city. Firstly, I was not allowed to sign a document confirming my consent to the outcome of the appeal. Those. it didn’t seem to exist. Secondly, as you remember, I decided to PERSONALLY attend the appeal, which means that my work should have been checked together with me, in a separate audience (perhaps without me, but there should have been a private meeting) and only after that I should have given points (as was done in other cities).

I and others were simply presented with a fact, thereby violating the appeal procedure. If someone knows where and how to write a complaint in this case, please unsubscribe in the comments, my future and the future of other graduates depend on it. With the help of Internet resources, a fake medalist was recently exposed, do not let this be silenced. I may be wrong about something, but then I told about everything that I know, about everything that I was informed about.

The pedagogical council was unable to find an appellant, who this year, as a result of filing an appeal, managed to increase his score by more than 3 primary ones. Although we have found those who believe that they have the right to a more serious promotion, and are ready to prove it. We hope that the point is not in the installation that was sent to all the appeal commissions, but in the fact that we were looking badly.

What if you disagree with the USE scores? How to properly file an appeal, how to behave with the commission and how to help yourself, the editorial staff of "Graduate" and daredevils-eyewitnesses tell. Official information (important!) Every student who has passed the exam has the right to appeal. The appeal may relate to both the procedure (violation of the established rules during the exam), and disagreement with the points. Appeals on the content and structure of the KIM and violations by the participants of the Unified State Exam of the established requirements for the performance of work are not accepted. The order, terms and place are announced no later than 2 weeks before the start of the exam. There is a conflict commission in each region. The student and / or his / her parents, as well as public observers, may be present during the consideration of the appeal. Order violation appeal An appeal for a violation of the order must be filed on the day of the examination, directly to the PPE (examination point). Step 1. You take the form from the organizer. Step 2. Make an appeal in duplicate. Step 3. You transfer them to the authorized representative of the GEC, who is obliged to leave one copy to you, and transfer the second to the conflict commission. Step 4. Find out the place and time. Step 5. You receive the results of the check, which are drawn up in the form of the commission's conclusion. The conflict commission considers the appeal no more than 2 working days and makes a decision to satisfy or reject the appeal. If the request is satisfied, the participant's result is canceled, and the participant is given the opportunity to take the exam on another day. Appeal of disagreement with the results of the exam The appeal is filed within 2 working days after the official announcement of the individual USE results and the participant familiarization with them. Graduates can submit an appeal about disagreement with points to their school, other USE participants - to the PPE. Step 1. Receive a form (2 copies) at the place of registration for the exam or from the executive secretary of the conflict commission. Step 2. Make an appeal in 2 copies. Step 3. You transfer both copies to the above persons (one copy should remain with you, the second is given to the conflict commission). Step 4. Find out the time and place of the appeal. Step 5. Come to the procedure for considering the appeal to the conflict commission. You need to have a passport and a pass with the stamp "Unified State Examination Forms Submitted" (or with a PPE stamp). participant of the exam or his parents may be present with him ( legal representatives, you must have a passport with you). At the request of the participant Unified State Exam appeal can be considered without it. The Conflict Commission considers the appeal no more than 4 working days from the date of filing. If the appeal is rejected, the score is retained. If the appeal is upheld, the participant is given a different score (the score can change both upward and downward). The work is checked completely, drafts are not considered. Unofficial information: real stories2015 graduate Tatyana Orlova filed an appeal on the results of the USE in social studies:"So, how does the appeal procedure go in reality? Graduates who are not satisfied with their results come to a specially designated place (we considered the appeal in the building of the Institute of Education). You come there and wait for your turn in the hall, like other guys." Many came with their parents: as you know, they can attend the appeal for the purity of rechecking your results. I waited for about 2.5 hours. When it came to my turn, I was invited by a woman expert of the conflict commission, and we went into a huge office, which was overflowing with experts and students. My eyes widened, but I was immediately directed to one of the other assessors, and I was asked questions about my work, in which tasks I was not satisfied with the given score. Experts check your work inside and out, then you move on to the discussion. The expert was able to answer all my questions, I did not see any aggression on her part. But she looked exhausted, the check lasted from 10 am to 7 pm, my turn had just come to its very end. But my classmate was less fortunate: they "dug" into her work pretty much, she had to sit for a long time and prove her case, somewhere in the region of half an hour. And I served 15 minutes. In the end, they added 2 primary scores, now my exam is not 78, but 82 points. The advice for those who decide to file an appeal is: be sure that you are right and double-check the work several times with your teachers. It is worth remembering that points can not only increase, but also decrease. By the way, another classmate of mine was credited as much as 3 primary points, although at the beginning of the appeal they even wanted to add 5. By the way, there is a small nuance: there can be 2, even 3 experts. At the end of the appeal, my classmate had a hard time, because there were three inspectors over her who could not come to the same opinion. Who is lucky with the experts is, alas, impossible to predict. " We spoke with several other 2015 alumni who went through the appeal process, and deduced a number of rules that are often violated in the pursuit of points: 1) Read the official information carefully, especially everything related to filling out the form, submitting applications, etc. Be competent in organizational matters! 2) Come ready to fight and armed to the best of your ability. No, knightly armor will not help you in any way, but a good knowledge of the criteria, KIMs and understanding the essence of your own claim will make you almost invulnerable. Especially, according to one of the experts of the commission, the graduates who forget that the Unified State Exam is assessed according to fairly clear criteria are annoying, which are not established by experts at all. 3) We believe that our readers are well-mannered and intelligent people, but if you are overwhelmed with emotions on an exam-nervous basis, hold back. Try not to argue with experts, but to argue and clearly prove your point of view. In turn, do not take their arguments with hostility. Remember that after the appeal, the points may not only be increased, but also decreased! Rudeness and impatience will definitely not play into your hands, but the opposite advice is not to give up early if the commission did not increase your score in the first three seconds. Professionals work there, but even they, looking at the prohibitive number of works per day, get tired and may not notice something. Mild persistence is the best policy. 4) When asked whether to appeal at all, opinions were divided. The justification for the risk obtained by the result depends on your ambitions, confidence in knowledge and the university where you want to go. However, there are far fewer cases of downgrading than cases where the score is increased or left unchanged. If you are confident that you deserve more, why not fight?

In case of disagreement with the points set on the exam, the cancellation of the assessment results, the illegal removal of the child from the exam, the parents - and the student himself - can appeal.

Let's consider what is the procedure for appealing the point results, when and how you can challenge the received document. You will also find out what is the practice of the Russian courts on this issue - and which side the judges are on.

In what cases can you file an appeal on the exam - deadlines for filing an appeal

A student undergoing the Unified State Exam procedure can challenge the decision of the commission, but the deadlines for appeals and filing an appeal are different.

Let us list when and in what cases the student can appeal the decision.

Cases of appealing the results of the exam	Example	Deadline for filing an appeal
Violation of the procedure for holding the exam	The student was illegally kicked out of the exam. The USE participant was given a cheat sheet, he did not use it. The commission had no evidence of violations. Member admissions committee found a phone next to the student that did not belong to the child.	The child or his teacher, legal representative must write an appeal without leaving the school in which he took the exam, on the same day - the day of the exam. Once the student submits the form, they can write an appeal. You can't pull!
Disagreement with the assigned points	The student knows and remembers that he put the correct answer on the form, and the commission members, due to inattention or by mistake, indicated the wrong result.	It will be possible to file an appeal within 2 days, not from the moment of the exam, but from the moment the results are announced.

Recall that the student should have been informed 2 weeks before the exam about how the delivery procedure would take place, how long it would be possible to appeal the decision, in what place.

It will not work to challenge the decision of the commission in any way if the student or parent wants to emphasize the incorrect content test items, the child's incorrectness of filling out the forms, the student's failure to comply with the requirements set by the members of the commission.

The procedure for appealing the exam in case of violation of the rules for holding the Unified State Exam - instructions

In order to challenge the decision of the commission, if the child was illegally kicked out of the exam - or the procedure for holding the Unified State Exam was violated for some other reason, you must follow the instructions:

Step 1. After submitting the forms, going out into the corridor, the student must contact the organizer.

Step 2. Explain that you want to make an appeal, state the reason.

Step 3. Ask for an application form. If the organizers stand their ground - to persuade you, do not write an appeal, do not listen to them. If you decide that you were illegally kicked out of the exam, then it is better to write an appeal right away. Then it will not be considered.

Step 4. Write a statement. In it, be sure to indicate for what reason the USE procedure was violated. Prepare an application in duplicate.

Step 5. Give the organizer one copy of the application, and keep the other for yourself, but just ask the teacher to sign it. This will serve as proof of your conversion.

Step 6. Wait for the results of the commission - they will be ready within 2 days. Pupils and parents can be invited to the meeting of the commission. You should have your passport with you.

Results of the conflict commission can be obtained at the school where the child is studying.

The documentation must state the decision, as well as the date and time of the retake of the exam.

How to challenge the USE results in case of disagreement with the received points for the exam - instructions

To challenge the scores already obtained, parents, or the student himself, must follow these instructions:

Step 1. Contact the educational institution where you are studying.

Step 2. Ask for an appeal form.

Step 3. Write a statement. It must be in the name of the director.

Step 4. Ask to sign the document. One option must be kept by the parent or student in order to have proof of their conversion. The other should be given to the director.

Step 5. Wait for the decision of the commission. The director must submit the application-appeal to the dispute committee. The student can be informed about the date if his presence is required.

As a rule, the application is considered quickly - within 1 week... After receiving the documentation, the student will either be assigned a retake day, or increase / decrease the point results, or keep the existing points.

The procedure for considering an appeal to the exam and terms

The procedure for considering applications to appeal the results of the exam is as follows:

1. The organizers must accept the student's appeal.
2. The application is submitted to the conflict commission, which does not include members subject commission.
3. If necessary, the participants in the conflict commission send a request to the RCOI of a certain object of the Russian Federation to provide information about the student's passing the exam. Videos, audio recordings, copies of minutes and other paper documentation can be submitted for review.
4. The conflict commission must check how the student's examination work was assessed, whether it meets all the requirements, and make a decision.

IMPORTANT: Parents or a student can be invited to the meeting. They may be provided with an answer form that the graduate completed to confirm that it was the applicant who did the work. Also, members of the subject committee may be invited to the meeting to establish the correct assessment of the student.

The student will be able to receive the decision of the commission within 4 days at the school where he is studying.

Judicial practice of appealing the results of the exam - how and when can you file a lawsuit?

After contacting the conflict commission, if the decision is not satisfactory, the student or his legal representatives can submit statement of claim to court.

Terms for contact not defined by law.

Of course, the sooner the claim is filed, the better. The child will have time to retake the exam this year.

In practice, judges do not always side with the students.

Here are some examples when the court agreed with the decision of the conflict commission:

Example 1. Petrov was kicked out of the exam due to cheating. Violations have been proven.

Example 2. Sokolova used a wristwatch with the function of receiving and transmitting data.

Example 3. Ivanov got a cheat sheet, but he was not caught cheating. Later, a video was sent, in which it was seen how Ivanov cheated.

And here are examples when parents and a graduate achieved recognition of their innocence:

Example 1. Sidorov was next to someone else's phone - he was lying on the floor when the student went to the toilet. The organizer demanded to pick up his phone, but Sidorov refused - he said that it was not his device. The organizer kicked the graduate out of the exam - thus, he was wrong.