How to appeal the results of the exam and avoid lowering points? Appeal to the exam in social studies Exam results how to file an appeal.

The field, the duel, are all historically state-sanctioned ways to determine justice when it cannot be done otherwise. Verbal dispute, appeal! How many such fights took place throughout the country in the struggle for USE scores-2015 in Social Studies! Some of them are our story.

Get the help of an USE expert in preparing for an appeal about disagreement with the scores!

Appeal against the results of the exam

So, the USE-2015 is in full swing. The main days of exams are over, reserve days have begun. USE scores are counted across the country. State authorities are medium (according to preliminary estimates, for example, in the Russian language, specialized mathematics and social studies, increased by an average of 3 points). Graduates who received all the results are common for admission (universities are already accepting documents). And some are preparing to revise them. That is to say, an appeal.

What is an appeal? This is a verbal duel between the graduate and the experts who reviewed the work. Humanitarian subjects - especially history, social science often contain in the form of answers not dogmas, but assumptions, theories. And the appeal often turns into a conversation ... what did you mean?(as sung in a popular song).

As we see USE participant can not only increase, but also has a chance of losing points as a result of consideration of his work in the written part 2. Since last year, by the way, it is also possible But .. more on that another time. The appeal procedure itself, by the way, causes completely different assessments of it ... One gets the impression that sometimes it depends on personal discretion (or arbitrariness) on the ground. For example, check out the interesting comments on our entry about Yes, and the graduates themselves are therefore just wondering what awaits them behind closed doors at the appeal. Here is an example of one of the "outreach" on social media:

As we can see, the preparation for the appeal begins long before the results of the exam are received. You need to seriously prepare for it. After all USE statistics shows that only less than 10% of those who filed an appeal can count on at least partial satisfaction.

What does the statistics say?

Let's look at the statistics of our group's subscribers
.So, how did our subscribers pass the USE-2015 in social studies?

Average above the guys across the country(bye GPA, announced by Rosobrnadzor without taking into account those who handed over the reserve and the appeal (on which, however, little changes globally) is 56.65. And about 60% of our subscribers, who prepared based on the materials of the site and the group, passed between 60 and 80 points, more than 20% are high scorers (more than 80 points!).

And what does our statistics say about the appeal to the Unified State Examination in Social Studies 2015?

The result of the appeal to the USE-2015 in social studies. Poll http://vk.com/egewin

Of those who voted under 90%, they simply did not go on appeal. For different reasons. but about 10% managed to defend from 1 to 3 of their which can then give a decent increase in test score on a 100-point scale.

Unconstructive approach to appealing the USE result

Should I fight for my points? We think YES! Although, there is an opinion that it is often useless. However, it is possible to convince experts with really low scores (and this is the result of natural subjectivism, the human factor, expert fatigue and a whole range of reasons). For example, here is my dialogue with a graduate Alisa Marisova, who managed to defend as many as 3 primary points!

And here is an example of a different attitude to the appeal procedure.

Many graduates understand that an appeal, well-prepared with the help of USE expert consultations, can allow them to get an important score for admission or two. But ... this is the time and strength of an expert, and maybe his paid service. Another dialogue in the studio (with Evgenia Zemlyanskaya). Please check essay:

A small remark for infantile graduates. The analysis of your essay is the responsibility of the teacher who taught you social studies. I don't owe you anything, do you agree? And now multiply the number of requests like yours to me by the part of those who pass the exam in society in Russia?

Learn to respect the work of others and know that in adult life where you go for everything you have to pay.

A constructive approach to appealing the USE result

And here is another appeal to the expert, and a completely different attitude to the need for an appeal, an understanding of its extreme importance for the final result, income. Note that Elya Karpaeva- a first-year student, studying in Vladivostok. Last year, she could not pass the budget, and again she is trying to get the score necessary for entering the budget this year! Unified State Exam-2015 in social studies, she passed on 82 points(25 higher than the average for Russia!).

Note that in the test part 1, the graduate lost only 1 point! Things were a little worse in For which Elya was going to fight with my help! At the same time, it’s nice when they say thanks for the work (Elya used the author in preparation):

Analysis of responses and choice of strategy for appeal

Let's look at the forms of part 2 of the graduate, which she received in her personal account on the USE-2015 technical support resource:

We note the large amount of work done by the applicant, good readable handwriting and absolutely correct formatting of the answers: where necessary, the task condition is written out, the work of the expert is facilitated as much as possible. Such works usually cause only a desire to meet the needs of the graduate!

So, we didn’t have the text and assignments for it, so we decided to leave assignment 30, the wording of which the applicant did not remember. Our focus was on assignments

Gross mistake. on this Do not argue, here the appeal is meaningless.

Task 34

For this task, one of the points was not set, the maximum is 3.

Task 34

At 34, to be honest, I don’t understand why they carped. That's right, you gave all three signs of this type of society. Might just sound a little vague. "increase in life expectancy". Formally, after all, it also occurs in comparison with But, you specify * developed medicine (ideally, of course, it would be nice to add that medicine is capable of defeating previously incurable diseases - cancer, AIDS).
Here need to fight. Now let's give an example for argumentation about the development of medicine in an industrial society.

By 1960, there were 20 doctors per 10,000 people in the USSR, 19.3 in the RSFSR, and only 15.5 in Western Siberia. Science Library dissertations and abstracts disserCat http://www.dissercat.com/content/razvitie-zdravookhra..(Development of healthcare in the cities of Western Siberia (1946-1960) dissertation for the degree of candidate of historical sciences. MP Dudkina).

2010 Among the countries with the largest number of doctors per capita, Russia, according to WHO, ranks fifth - for every 10,000 Russians there are 42 doctors with higher education.

That is, we compare the indicators of industrial (1960) and societies (2010).

The mobility of industrial society is massive. For example, mass moving to cities, migration to the New World (USA of the 19th century).

No, I'm not talking about that. It is clear that there are more mobility channels and access to them is also wider. The man of the industrial public is tied to a machine tool. The mobility of a post-industrial society is individual. The means of transport are much more developed. Internet is added. It allows a person to create an information product, to do work while traveling, changing countries of the world. An example from life is the phenomenon of freelancing. This is how the creators of information, information products — web designers, people of free professions — do their work and earn money. We are much more mobile than a person 20-30 years ago.

The final arguments of the members of the conflict commission turned out to be more than paradoxical:

1. Russia is not a post-industrial society (!!!).2. Theory is not connected with practice (!!!).

Well, on the face of complete incompetence and inability to move away from the mental template, blinders, in other words. An attempt to dispute the score here failed.

This is a complex plan. And again we fight for 1 not exposed point.

The first thing that confuses me is the structure of your plan. It looks like a convulsive attempt to throw everything you know about on paper. And the structure and its consistency is one of the key evaluation criteria.
Ideally, it could look like this:

1. The concept of "power"
2. Types of power:
- political
— economic
- military
- spiritual
— informational
3. Signs political power:
- sovereignty
- legitimacy
- concentration in the hands of the state
- monopoly on the legal use of force
- monopoly on the issuance of laws
4. We would have matched

So, they could have been reduced for: 1. lack of information about other types of power; 2. Lack of structured response (for example, the concept definitely does not need to be disclosed); 3. Item "principles of existence". For example, subparagraph b) performance. Is political reforms, for example, are always effective? 4. An important point about the state and its role was “hidden” at the end and not disclosed. And they should have been brought to the fore.

This is called the structural approach. If political is a kind of power, you need to start with power. You can try to appeal to the plan, but I think there will be no result.

And, indeed, according to the applicant, the experts in the conflict commission were even going to lower the score (they have the right !!!).

The first thing you need to know about the exam. All exam results are posted on the official website. Moreover, the graduate can not only get acquainted with the number of points scored for each task, but also view a scan of his work. To do this, you just need to go to the appropriate section and enter your full name and passport data.

As a rule, controversial points in assessment arise in the written part. test part checks the computer and fails it does not happen. It happens that the examinee wrote an incorrect answer, and the system simply could not parse it; in such situations, an appeal is not filed, because the fault here lies entirely with the graduate.

So, you looked through the written part and decided that the reviewer underestimated your scores - this is not a reason to file an appeal. Take your work, check the assessment criteria (everything is detailed there) and consult with your subject teacher. If after all this your opinion has not changed, file an appeal. And now more about this procedure.

Who reviews the appeal?

The rights of participants during the USE are protected by a specially created conflict commission. She will resolve all controversial issues regarding the procedure for passing exams and evaluating work.

When considering an appeal, a USE participant and (or) his parents (legal representatives), as well as public observers, may be present. You can (and even need to) take a teacher with you, but for this you will need to issue a notarized confirmation that he is your legal representative.

In what cases can an appeal be filed?

There are two types of appeal: about violation of the established procedure for conducting the exam in the relevant academic subject (there were not enough drafts, repairs were made in the corridor and there was noise, etc.); about disagreement with the points.

The Commission will not consider issues related to the content and structure of KIMs, i.e. the claim "That was a stupid question" will not be accepted. They will also not accept applications where claims are related to:

• evaluating the results of completing the tasks of the examination paper with a short answer;
• in violation of the participant USE requirements established by the Procedure (if you violated the rules, for example, carried a cheat sheet with you or started making noise and you were removed, then only you are to blame);
• with the incorrect design of the examination paper.

The CC does not consider the drafts of the USE participant as appeal materials (once again, they filled out the form incorrectly, did not have time to rewrite something from the draft - your problems).

How and when to file an appeal?

Exam violation appeal must be submitted immediately after the end of the exam, i.e. without leaving the office. To do this, you must inform the inspector that you have a complaint. The application to the conflict commission is filled in two copies (you keep one for yourself).

Further, your application is sent to the commission on the same day, after which a check is made from: organizers who are not involved in the audience in which the appellant took the exam; technical specialists and assistants; public observers; law enforcement officers; medical workers are sent to the exam site. Exam participants are interviewed there, CCTV cameras are viewed.

Based on the results of the audit, the appellant is informed of the decision within two working days. If the appeal is satisfied, the USE participant takes the exam again on the reserve day.

Appeal about disagreement with the points are submitted within two working days after the official day of the announcement of the results in the relevant academic subject. So don't wait for the scores to be announced at the school. Monitor yourself USE portal.

The appeal is drawn up in writing in two copies. The application must be submitted to the school where you wrote the exam. It must be signed by the head of the State Examination Commission (director or head teacher). Further, this statement is transferred to the conflict commission, which will decide the fate of the graduate. The appeal is considered within four working days.

How is the appeal going?

If the complaint is filed against the results of the test part, the presence of the graduate is not required. If you are not satisfied with the assessment of the written or oral part of the exam, then you should be given a package of documents: a copy of your work and audio recordings of the answers, copies of the assessment protocols with all notes.

Prepare all your arguments in advance, and not on your own, but together with the teacher based on the FIPI assessment criteria. You will have only 20 minutes to prove your case.

Do not forget that your points can both increase and decrease. Although according to statistics, points are rarely lowered. If the appeal is satisfied, it is possible to increase 1-4 points.

In fact, the chances of increasing your scores are not so high. The inspectors are experienced experts. They make almost no mistakes. Still, there are a few tips:

• do not go to the appeal alone, be sure to take one of your parents with you, they will help you in a dispute with the commission;
• remember that your work should be checked in front of you, in no case in absentia;
• the commission must explain to you the reasons for the decrease in points, moreover, following the wording from the evaluation criteria. Common phrases "This is too cleverly written" are not reasons.

Photo: semyarf.com, ya2018.com, pronedra.ru

I like

In case of disagreement with the points set for the exam, the annulment of the assessment results, the illegal removal of the child from the exam, the parents - and the student himself - can file an appeal.

Let's consider what is the procedure for appealing scoring results, when and how you can challenge the received document. You will also learn what the practice of the Russian courts is on this issue - and which side the judges take.

In what cases can an appeal be filed for the exam - deadlines for filing an appeal

A student undergoing the Unified State Exam procedure can challenge the decision of the commission, but the deadlines for applying and filing an appeal are different.

We list when and in what cases a student can appeal a decision.

Cases of appealing the results of the exam	Example	Time limit for filing an appeal
Violation of the procedure for conducting the exam	The student was illegally kicked out of the exam. The USE participant was thrown a cheat sheet, he did not use it. The commission had no evidence of violations. Member admission committee I found a phone next to the student that did not belong to the child.	The child or his teacher, legal representative must write an appeal without leaving the school where he took the exam on the same day - the day the exam was taken. As soon as the student submits the form, he can write an appeal. You can't pull!
Disagreement with the scores	The student knows and remembers that he put the correct answer on the form, and the members of the commission, due to inattention or mistakenly, indicated the wrong result.	It will be possible to file an appeal within 2 days, not from the moment of the exam, but from the moment the results are announced.

Recall , that the student should have been informed 2 weeks before the exam about how the passing procedure will take place, in what time it will be possible to appeal the decision, in what place.

There is no way to challenge the decision of the commission if the student or parent wants to emphasize the wrong content. test items, incorrectness by the child of filling out the forms, non-compliance by the student with the requirements set by the members of the commission.

The procedure for appealing the USE in case of violation of the rules for conducting the Unified State Exam - instructions

In order to challenge the decision of the commission, if the child was illegally kicked out of the exam - or the procedure for conducting the Unified State Exam was violated for some other reason, you must follow the instructions:

Step 1. After submitting the forms, going out into the corridor, the student must contact the organizer.

Step 2 Explain that you want to appeal, state the reason.

Step 3 Ask for an application form. If the organizers will stand their ground - to persuade you not to write an appeal, do not listen to them. If you decide that you were illegally kicked out of the exam, then it is better to write an appeal right away. Then it will not be considered.

Step 4 Write a statement. In it, be sure to indicate for what reason the USE procedure was violated. Prepare two copies of the application.

Step 5 Give the organizer one copy of the application and keep the other for yourself, but only ask the teacher to sign it. This will serve as proof of your appeal.

Step 6 Wait for the results of the commission - they will be ready within 2 days. The student and parents may be invited to the meeting of the commission. You should have your passport with you.

Results of the conflict commission can be obtained at the school where the child is studying.

The decision must be written in the documentation, as well as the date and time of the retake of the exam.

How to challenge the results of the exam in case of disagreement with the points obtained for the exam - instructions

To challenge the points already received, parents, or the student himself, must follow the following instructions:

Step 1. Contact educational institution where you study.

Step 2 Ask for an appeal form.

Step 3 Write a statement. It must be in the name of the director.

Step 4 Ask to sign the document. One option the parent or student must keep for themselves in order to have proof of their conversion. The other one should be given to the director.

Step 5 Wait for the committee's decision. The director must submit the application-appeal to the conflict commission. The date of the event can be communicated to the student if his presence is required.

As a rule, the application is considered quickly - within 1 week. After receiving the documentation, the student will either be assigned a retake day, or will increase / decrease the score results, or retain the existing scores.

The procedure for considering an appeal to the exam and terms

The procedure for considering applications for appealing the results of the exam is as follows:

1. The organizers must accept the student's appeal.
2. The application is submitted to the conflict commission, which does not include members subject commission.
3. If necessary, the participants of the conflict committee send a request to the RCOI of a certain object of the Russian Federation to provide information about the student passing the exam. Videos, audio recordings, copies of protocols and other paper documentation may be submitted for consideration.
4. The conflict commission must check how the student's examination work was assessed, according to all the requirements, and make a decision.

IMPORTANT: Parents or students may be invited to the meeting. They may be provided with an answer sheet filled out by the graduate to confirm that it was the applicant who did the work. Also, members of the subject committee may be invited to the meeting to establish the correctness of the assessment of the student.

The student will be able to receive the decision of the commission within 4 days at the school where he is studying.

Judicial practice of appealing the results of the exam - how and when can you file a lawsuit?

After contacting the conflict commission, if the decision is not satisfactory, the student or his legal representatives can file statement of claim to court.

Terms for applying not defined by law.

Of course, the sooner the claim is filed, the better. The child will have time to retake the exam this year.

In practice, judges do not always take the side of the students.

Here are a few examples where the court agreed with the decision of the conflict commission:

Example 1 Petrov was kicked out of the exam due to cheating. Violations have been proven.

Example 2 Sokolova used a wrist watch with the function of receiving and transmitting data.

Example 3 Ivanov's cheat sheet fell out, but he was not caught cheating. Later, a video was sent, which showed how Ivanov was cheating.

And here are examples when parents and a graduate achieved recognition of their innocence:

Example 1 Sidorov was next to someone else's phone - he was lying on the floor when the student went to the toilet. The organizer demanded to pick up his phone, but Sidorov refused - he said that it was not his device. The organizer expelled the graduate from the exam - thus, he was wrong.

A list of the main points to pay attention to when filing an appeal.

started passing the exam and the first results will appear soon. Some of the graduates will breathe a sigh of relief when they see them, and someone will think that in fact he deserves more, and the grade given by the inspectors does not reflect his real level of knowledge. What to do in this case?

The answer lies on the surface - graduates who want to challenge the result of the exam can resort to an appeal - a procedure aimed at protecting the rights of the examinees. Whether it's worth it or not is ultimately up to each individual. On the one hand, this, of course, is additional stress and risk. But sometimes one or two extra points can be decisive when entering a university, and therefore there are always those who are ready to go all the way.

In what cases can an appeal be filed?

There are two such cases. The first is the contestation of the very procedure for conducting the exam, the violation of which led to the fact that you could not write the exam as successfully as possible.

The second option is to challenge the points obtained on the exam. Let's consider each of the above options in a little more detail.

Appeal in case of violation of the procedure for conducting the exam

In this case, the appeal must be filed immediately after the end of the exam, and before the student leaves the class. It is required to write an application in two copies - the first of them goes to the conflict commission, and the second remains with the graduate. In this case, it is necessary to ensure that a member of the examination committee puts a note on the application that the document has been accepted for consideration.

The application must also be registered in a special journal and considered within two days after submission. The date, place and time of the procedure must be communicated to the student and his parents or legal representatives.
As a result, the commission may satisfy the requirements of the student, or, on the contrary, decide that they are groundless. A positive decision of the commission means that the result of the work will be canceled, and the student will be able to rewrite the exam - special days are allocated for this in the schedule. If the decision is negative, the exam result remains unchanged.

Appeal in case of disagreement with the results of the exam

In this case, the appeal must be filed within two working days from the date of announcement of the results of the exam in the subject. As in the previous case, you will need to write two copies of the application, sending one of them to the conflict commission, and keeping the second for yourself. The application must be marked that it is drawn up in the form and accepted for consideration.

The decision to hold an appeal must be made no later than 4 working days after the receipt of such an application by the conflict commission. Each application goes through a registration process, and information regarding the date, time and place of the appeal is communicated to the student (his parents or legal representatives).

At the appeal, the student must be shown a package of his documents and a written conclusion of the commission on the subject. At this stage, you need to be especially careful: the student will have to sign that, for example, the scanned work with answers belongs to him. Members of the Appeal Panel must be clear about why certain scores were awarded. The procedure usually takes no more than 20 minutes per student. Based on its results, the commission can make the following decisions:
- reject the student's requirements and keep the points given if no technical or other errors were found in the assessment process;
- satisfy the appeal and change the scores if errors were found. At the same time, it should be remembered that the scores can be revised both in one direction and the other (increased or reduced).

What is important to do before the appeal?

First of all, it is necessary to refresh your work in memory to the maximum in order to have arguments for defending your own point of view.

You should also carefully read the scoring criteria to understand how objective you think the commission's decision on each item is;
approach the subject teacher or tutor with whom you were preparing for the exam - they will help you sort out the ambiguous points and give recommendations on how to behave and explain your opinion.

It is also important that for each item with which you do not agree, it is necessary to formulate an exact question to the commission in advance so that the conversation is substantive, and you could explain why you did it this way and not in another way. Argumentation supported by concrete facts always looks more compelling.

How to behave on appeal?

Here you can advise the following:
First, go to your appeal with a parent or other adult who can represent you. Yesterday's schoolboy, most likely, will be confused in the face of the conflict commission. In addition, he may be given an answer devoid of specifics. Mom, dad or other close person will help you feel much more confident, and their opinion and arguments can play a decisive role in the dispute.

Second: insist that the work be rechecked in your presence. Quite often, the graduate is told that the work has already been rechecked, and the commission decided to leave the result unchanged. Remember that this state of affairs grossly violates your rights - an absentee appeal is possible only if the student and his representatives simply did not appear for the procedure. The final decision on the work must be made in the presence of the appellant, and the members of the commission must explain each deducted point.

Third: do not leave the venue of the appeal until an exhaustive explanation of the work and decision of the commission has been given. All low scores must meet the criteria put forward for evaluating the work, so do not accept as an answer the general wording that the scores for the solved CMM are already high enough. Until you are satisfied with the explanation for each deducted point, do not sign the appeal documents.

Fourth: don't give up halfway. If you have already decided to appeal, then, by and large, there is nothing to lose.

Fifth: don't be afraid to appeal. Be calm and confident. Think of this procedure as an opportunity to defend your interests. Remember that a significant part of the students who are not satisfied with their results are simply afraid to go to the appeal so as not to lose their points. Of course, if a member of the commission finds additional errors during the check, the points may be revised downward. However, general statistics show that points are usually raised more often than they are lowered.

According to Rosobrnadzor, in 2019, almost 750,000 people registered to participate in the unified state exams, of which 662,000 are graduates of this year. On June 13, unified state exams in biology and computer science, who completed the main stage of the main period. Until July 1, the main period of the exam will continue to reserve days for the delivery of all subjects. As recalled in the department, graduates who do not agree with the results of the unified state exam can file an appeal.

When can an appeal be filed?

There are two types of appeal. The first is about violation of the established procedure for conducting the exam. It is submitted directly on the day of the exam. The decision is made after consideration by a special commission. If satisfied, the graduate has the right to re-write the exam.

The second type of appeal is about disagreement with the scores. This is what graduates most often submit. AiF.ru tells how to do it right and how not to get less points in the end.

How to prepare for an appeal?

A graduate has the right to file an appeal within two days of the official publication of the USE results. After receiving the results, seek help from teachers and tutors. For objectivity, it is better to ask the opinion of several experts. Discuss in detail which criteria you disagree with, formulate a clear argument for your position. You can not revise the content and structure of the tasks themselves, as well as answers to questions with a short answer.

How is the appeal going?

The commission appoints the time and place of the appeal, where the graduate can come either alone or accompanied by parents or other legal representatives. If you prepare in advance, you can issue a power of attorney for the teacher. In this case, he will be required to let him go along with the student.

All necessary materials are presented to the participant of the examination, who confirms in writing that he has been presented with the examination paper he has completed.

If the commission declares from the threshold that the work has already been checked, no points have been added and nothing will be discussed with you, you should not be afraid to ask for an explanation in detail why such a decision was made. Do not sign any documents, fight to the last. If this dispute is not resolved, ask for an appeal to federal level. However, you need to be as sure as possible that the work deserves such a painstaking evaluation and there really is a controversial point.

The student may not be present at the appeal: in this case, the decision is made solely on the basis of the commission's check.

How to get higher USE scores?

The graduate, together with the commission, consider controversial answers to tasks with a detailed answer. Both sides express their reasoned position. And here much depends on the ability of the graduate to speak clearly and reasonably. If you are a shy or nervous person, do not be afraid to come to the appeal with your parents. They will help if you get confused.

What if they want to lower rather than raise the score?

Indeed, the conflict commission can both raise and lower the score. Past graduates often share their sad stories and tips on how to avoid it. The most important of them is not to sign any documents if you do not agree with the outcome of this appeal. Without your signature, if you are present, the results of the appeal will not be valid.